Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Exploring Michigan's Controversial Cannabis Tax

Michigan is at the forefront of a heated cannabis policy debate, now centered on the introduction of a 24% wholesale marijuana tax. This new tax is under legal scrutiny, expected to significantly impact cannabis pricing and influence state tax policies nationwide.

Even if you're not from Michigan or a cannabis consumer, this legal battle holds importance. The court's decision could set a precedent for how states across the U.S. approach cannabis taxation, potentially foreshadowing future legal disputes as the industry expands.

Understanding Michigan's Tax Proposal

In their 2025–2026 budget, Michigan legislators have approved a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, intended to generate funds for road maintenance. This tax targets the supply chain before products are dispensed for retail.

Existing taxes in Michigan include:

  • A 10% excise tax on consumer cannabis purchases approved in 2018

  • The 6% state sales tax. If enforced, the new tax would create one of the most complex cannabis tax structures in the nation.

Image 1

The Industry's Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) claims this tax breaches constitutional terms. The core argument: the 2018 voter-backed marijuana statute cannot be altered without a supermajority legislative vote.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), which legalized recreational cannabis, requires any amendments to achieve a three-fourths supermajority.

However, the new wholesale tax passed with a simple majority, a move challenged by MCIA. "We aim to honor Michigan voters' intent," Rose Tantraphol, MCIA spokesperson, stressed in Michigan Advance.

Image 2

Associations warn that this tax threatens to amplify expenses, pressure small businesses, and potentially pivot consumers back towards unregulated options—a scenario evident in high-tax states like California.

The State's Defense

Michigan's administration contends the tax is legitimate due to:

  • The introduction of an entirely new tax, not an amendment to the 2018 law

  • The legislative power to levy taxes to meet budget requirements

  • The intention to support road infrastructure, not modify cannabis regulations

Should the courts validate these claims, the tax could be enacted as early as January 1, 2026.

Potential Effects on Consumers

Image 3

The outcome of this case could drive trends across state lines, impacting how cannabis tax frameworks influence each other. Surviving legal challenges could mean:

  • A rise in wholesale and possibly retail prices

  • Unregulated markets could gain traction due to cost shifts

  • Consolidation pressure might mount on smaller businesses

If overturned, Michigan would maintain its currently competitive tax structure.

National Implications of the Case

This legal confrontation, though taking place in Michigan, carries significant nationwide ramifications.

1. Tests the scope of voter-backed laws

If taxes can be added without supermajority consent, it could redefine ballot initiative operations nationwide.

2. May guide other states’ tax models

States balancing infrastructure budgets might replicate Michigan's strategies if successful here.

3. Highlights the inconsistency of cannabis taxes

With varying taxes in states like Oregon versus California, Michigan's lawsuit may set a template for future tax disputes.

What Lies Ahead?

Following initial hearings, the Michigan Court of Claims is poised to deliver its decision shortly. Regardless of the verdict, this case will resonate beyond the cannabis sector—affecting state handling of voter-endorsed laws, novel industries, and tax jurisdictions.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .